This is done because the lobbying groups want someone in leadership that will represent their interests at the legislative table. There will likely be lobbyist influence in Washington all the time, but with new faces coming in every few years, the establishment issues being experienced currently would begin to be less disruptive than they currently are.
That could allow for more positive legislation to be introduced, if not passed, in each session. Fundraising is a top priority for most politicians. Re-election campaigns are already starting to raise money for the next election cycle before the current one begins in many circumstances. It took Donald Trump fewer than 3 months to establish a fundraising PAC for his anticipated election campaign.
Many Republicans and Democrats have taken similar actions. There will always be money in politics, but with term limits in place, it could be shifted toward something better than another re-election. That means a minority of voters usually decides the direction the nation will take for the next 2 or 4 years. With term limits in place, more candidates would be able to present their positions to the voting public.
If you look at the history of legislation in Washington, most of it is just recycled ideas from previous years. Even major legislation items, such as the Affordable Care Act, is a reboot from Republican efforts to nationalize healthcare in To get new ideas in Congress, new people need to be sent there to make that happen.
It would prevent the isolation that elected officials currently enjoy more often because more people would have a chance to get their opinions heard in a meaningful way. In the United States, being a politician in Washington is seen more as a career option than a temporary assignment. Elected officials do what they need to do to continue that career. Term limits would change the perspective.
Term limits would make the impacts of any politician be limited by nature. Once passed as an amendment to the constitution, it would require another amendment to reverse the term limits. Only once in the history of the United States has an amendment been repealed. That was the 18th amendment, which prohibited the manufacturing or sale of alcohol within the country.
It was repealed by the actions of the 21st amendment. Requiring more people to become elected officials because of term limits would change the learning curve in how Washington works.
Term limits could potentially increase gridlock. Imagine telling doctors that they had to stop working after 12 years. It would change how the industry performs in mostly negative ways. Politics should always be welcoming of young and energetic people who have great ideas.
No term limit is a way of shutting the door to them. Less Corruption, Possibly Corruption is almost always systematic. Absence of term limits allows the existence and further strengthening of corrupt coteries and status quos. The only way to curb corruption in the congress is to allow new people to come in and also to have disincentives for those looking for corrupt ways. When congressmen and congresswomen need to keep raising funds for their reelections, they are likely to resort to corrupt practices.
Experience Matters Congressional term limits would forcefully retire people or prevent capable and experienced politicians from getting reelected even if they have something more to offer. To get an idea, here are arguments expressed by proponents and critics regarding term limits for Congress.
It deters corruption of government officials. One of the contentions of advocates for Congress term limits point out that the longer a person in power, such as a congressman, stay in office, the bigger the possibility for him or her to be more hungry for power and wealth which might make the person corrupt.
However, if the time is limited and a politician is not eligible to run for another term, there will be lesser room for corruption since special interests will not be able to ask favors easily in exchange for donations for the supposedly next term. It gives way to fresh and dynamic politics. If term limits for Congress will be enacted, deserving people who have not yet run for the seat will be given a chance to serve. As opposed to a political system which allows congressmen to run for several terms, a limited term in Congress can mean fresh ideas coming from younger politicians who may have new contributions to make.
It encourages politicians to do better service. Supporters of term limits for Congress see it as a way for members of Congress to pay more attention on doing their jobs and serving their constituents.
Since they will not be allowed to run or extend terms, there will be no reason for them to be distracted by focusing on how they will win on the next election. It gives room to inexperienced politicians. Critics of term limits argue that most new politicians tend to be ideological and lack the experience long-term politicians have.
The Cons of Congressional Term Limits. 1. When someone spends a long period of time at a job, they tend to become far more skilled than they were when they began working at it. Term limits for Congress limits the chances of someone growing into their position and becoming even better at it.
Term limits kick out the good leaders who may deserve to stay in office for excellent work. Every job has a learning curve, and Congress is no exception. Any new politicians would have to go through that when they come into office.
Term limits reduce the immediate pressure on elected officials who will soon face voters by limiting the amount of time defining the amount of time they will serve in the position ahead of time. This should allow them to focus on the long term needs of the country as opposed to the current political climate. The idea of imposing term limits for Congress, or a mandatory restriction on how long members of the House and Senate can serve in office, has been debated by the public for centuries. There are pros and cons and strong opinions on both sides of the issue, perhaps a surprise, given the electorate.
Term limits for Congress have various pros and cons to be considered. Seniority creates the ability to facilitate change in Washington DC, but it also creates gridlock because congressional representatives also wish to continue being re-elected. Recommended Posts. Alternative to FEGLI Option B. Recent Posts. Alcoholism and Verbal Abuse; Hyponatremia and Alcoholism.