These back street abortions are very dangerous and could maybe even lead to the mother dying as well as the child dying. So for this reason Pro Choice believe abortions should be allowed.
Woman may not have the facilities and the money to raise a child! This argument is based on the fact that bringing up a child can be a financial burden. Pro Choice believe that if a mother feels she will not be able to care for the child then it is irresponsible on her part to bring a child into the world.
A woman has become pregnant as the result of rape or her life is at risk if she has the child! Pro Choice argue that it is unfair to force mother to go through the trauma of pregnancy to have a child which will make her feel hurt as it will remind her of the rape. Pro choice groups also argue that if a mothers life is at risk then she shouldn't have to go through with pregnancy because it would leave any other children she has motherless.
The child maybe born with physical or mental abnormality! This argument is based on a warped value system that says that a person with a mental or physical handicap is worth less than a person who has no disability.
Read full document Save. Download as for upgraded members. If the cessation of heartbeat could define death, could the onset of a heartbeat define life? The heart is formed by the 18th day in the womb. If heartbeat was used to define life, then nearly all abortions would be outlawed. Physicians now use a more rigorous criterion for death: A flat EEG electroencephalograph is one of the most important criteria used to determine death.
If the cessation of brain wave activity can define death, could the onset of brain wave activity define life? Individual brain waves are detected in the fetus in about days. Using brain wave activity to define life would outlaw at least a majority of abortions. Opponents to abortion also raise the controversial issue of fetal pain. Does the fetus feel pain during abortion? The evidence seems fairly clear and consistent. Consider this statement made in a British medical journal: She opens her mouth to cry and also pulls away.
Try sticking an 8-week-old human fetus in the palm of his hand. He opens his mouth and pulls his hand away. A more technical description would add that changes in heart rate and fetal movement also suggest that intrauterine manipulations are painful to the fetus. Obviously, other medical criteria could be used. For example, the developing fetus has a unique set of fingerprints as well as genetic patterns that make it unique. We can discern eyes, ears, fingers, a nose, and a mouth.
Our visual senses tell us this is a baby growing and maturing. This is not a piece of protoplasm; this is a baby inside the womb. The point is simple. Medical science leads to a pro-life perspective rather than a pro-choice perspective. If medical science can be used at all to draw a line, the clearest line is at the moment of conception. Medical arguments provide a strong case against abortion and for life. The best legal argument against abortion can be seen in the case of Roe v. It violated standard legal reasoning.
The Supreme Court decided not to decide when life begins and then turned around and overturned the laws of 50 different states.
Although the sentences sounded both innocuous and unpretentious, they were neither. It overturned state laws that protected the unborn and has resulted in over 30 million abortions roughly the population of Canada in the United States. The decision also seems unpretentious by acknowledging that it did not know when life begins. A crucial role of government is to protect life. Government cannot remove a segment of the human population from its protection without adequate justification.
The burden of proof should lie with the life-taker, and the benefit of the doubt should be with the life-saver. The burden of proof in law is on the prosecution. The benefit of doubt is with the defense.
This is also known as a presumption of innocence. The defendant is assumed to be innocent unless proven guilty. Again the burden of proof is on the entity that would take away life or liberty. The benefit of the doubt lies with the defense. The Supreme Court clearly stated that it does not know when life begins and then violated the very spirit of this legal principle by acting as if it just proved that no life existed in the womb.
Even more curious was the fact that to do so, it had to ignore the religious community and international community on the subject of the unborn. Had the religious community really failed to reach a consensus? Although there were some intramural disagreements, certainly the weight of evidence indicated that a Western culture founded on Judeo-Christian values held abortion to be morally wrong. People with widely divergent theological perspectives Jewish, Catholic, evangelical and fundamental Protestants shared a common agreement about the humanity of the unborn.
The same could be said about the international legal community. The unborn were protected by various international documents like the Declaration of Geneva and the U. Declaration of the Rights of the Child. Just as there are solid medical arguments against abortion, so also there are legal arguments against abortion. Wade was a bad decision that needs to be overturned. A third set of arguments against abortion would be philosophical arguments. A key philosophical question is where do you draw the line?
Put another way, when does a human being become a person? Wade separated personhood from humanity. In other words, the judges argued that a developing fetus was a human i. Since only persons are given 14th Amendment protection under the Constitution, the Court argued that abortion could be legal at certain times. This left to doctors, parents, or even other judges the responsibility of arbitrarily deciding when personhood should be awarded to human beings.
Once the Court allowed people to start drawing lines, some drew them in unexpected ways and effectively opened the door for infanticide and euthanasia. In the past, such criteria as implantation or quickening had been suggested. Furthermore, abortion denies the mother the joy and opportunity to raise the baby, and in the long run, usually ends up hurting the mother as the emotional effects become worse and worse.
This problem is even more common when there is pressure by others on the woman to have the abortion, and she does so reluctantly.
Another reason why I do not believe abortions should be done is because of the many risks involved for the woman undergoing the abortion. The risks involved are both medical and emotional. The medical risks when perfo Get your essays here, 33, to choose from! Argument Against Abortion 3 Pages Words Reflection Paper — Abortion The word abortion by definition means the induced expulsion of a fetus from the womb before it is able to survive independently.
Persuasive essay against abortion - here the author should encompass as many as possible of reasons, ideas and research to make a comprehensive analysis of the negative aspects only; Abortion pro-choice essay - shows to the readers some of the ideas why, in certain cases, pregnancy terminating might .
For and Against Abortion There are many topics that most people are for and against which is I guess a normal reaction to some things. One of the most controversial topics would be abortion. According to the U.S., abortion statics in million abortions took place (U.S abortion Statistics, ).
An Argument Against Abortion - An Argument Against Abortion Abortion is a serious topic that people have been debating about for years. Everywhere you turn the topic of abortion presents itself, on TV, in the newspapers, in books and magazines. It already has, . The Argument of Abortion - Philosophy Essay The Argument of Abortion - Philosophy Essay In On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion, Mary Anne Warren discusses a few arguments against abortion, namely bringing into play whether the fetus is actually a person, or “not a .
Abortion is an extremely controversial issue because while some people are completely against it, others believe that a woman should have the right to choose. I believe that . The word abortion by definition means the induced expulsion of a fetus from the womb before it is able to survive independently. Abortion is an extremely controversial issue because while some people are completely against it, others believe that a woman should have the right to choose. I believe /5(9).